Skip to main content

A CONTINUATION OF SABBATHICAL ADMONITIONS POSTED FROM MARCH 4TH TO PRESENT

Sharing some further thoughts on the Sabbath Greeting "Happy Sabbath": On the point of saying "Blessed Sabbath, Holy Sabbath, or Pleasant Sabbath instead of "Happy Sabbath", I saw that men in the world would say and with good intention to each other "Be Happy". However as to the "way how" that is achieved, people generally have a host of different ideas in their mind. There was even a song at one time "Be happy don't worry". However the phrase "Be Happy" is not instructive in itself as how to be happy or pointed as Christians should in directing people to God. In a world where so much is overlooked and misunderstood our words need to be far more pointed and pregnant of spiritual truths. If one says "be Blessed" or "be Holy" instantly ones mind thinks of the source of blessings and holiness. Hence saying "Have Holy Sabbath" or "Blessed Sabbath" is better. While "Pleasant Sabbath" has with it the idea of doing things according to God's pleasure those things that are pleasant in His sight. as it is written:
Isaiah 58:13 If thou turn away thy foot from the sabbath, from doing thy pleasure on my holy day; and call the sabbath a delight, the holy of the Lord, honourable; and shalt honour him, not doing thine own ways, nor finding thine own pleasure, nor speaking thine own words
Furthermore the sanctifying knowledge that comes with Sabbath keeping can be referred to as Pleasant but that sanctifying knowledge cannot be referred to as "happy" which has with it the idea of the day being given by God for persons to "be happy" on the day. The focus of Sabbath keeping for us to to benifit from it must be God centered and not self centered. Hence the "Happy Sabbath" greeting should be replaced with words that are more Spiritual and instructive towards Sabbath keeping in holiness.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WHAT OUR INQUIRY ABOUT OURSELVES SHOULD BE?

WHAT OUR INQUIRY ABOUT OURSELVES  SHOULD BE? We are in the very last days, we are told that the last controversy will be very short. “We are standing on the threshold of great and solemn events. Prophecies are fulfilling. The last great conflict will be short, but terrible. Old controversies will be revived. New controversies will arise. We have a great work to do. Our ministerial work must not cease. The last warning must be given to the world. There is a special power in the presentation of the truth at the present time. How long will it last? Only a little while.” Ellen G. White, Selected Messages bk. 3, pg. 419. And in view of the lateness of time, what should be the inquiry of everyone? We are told: “The inquiry of everyone should be ‘whose am I? To whom do I owe allegiance? Is my heart renewed? Is my soul reformed? Are my sins forgiven? Will they be blotted out when the time of refreshing shall come?” Ibid, pg. 419. We must needs examine ourselves to see if we are

DID ELLEN G. WHITE EVER CALL THE S.D.A. CHURCH BABYLON IN ANY WAY? BY NYRON MEDINA

In the Bible is brought to view the following statement: “And after these things I  saw another angel come down from heaven, having great power; and the earth was  lightened with his glory. And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying,  Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird. For all  nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the  earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are  waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies. And I heard another voice  from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her  sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.” Revelation 18:1-4. Of this Scripture  we are told that it speaks about the Church, fallen because of sins. “In amazement  they [the people] hear the testimony that Babylon is the church,

IMPUTED AND IMPARTED RIGHTEOUSNESS EXPLAINED By Nyron Medina

IMPUTED AND IMPARTED RIGHTEOUSNESS  EXPLAINED By Nyron Medina Statement of the case 1. Imputed and imparted righteousness are usually seen as different things in apostate  theology; they are presented as happening either successively or at the very same time,  but they are presented as two different salvific functions.  “In this most illuminating paragraph, the writer traces two distinct phases in the process  of our salvation—two complementary aspects of the plan of redemption—which are in a  certain sense successive, but at the same time simultaneous; two different operations of  the same righteousness of Christ, which alone can satisfy the demands of divine justice  and make saints of us. Let us analyze in outline form these two phases:  A. THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF CHRIST BY WHICH WE ARE JUSTIFIED.  1. It is imputed to us, which is, credited, granted freely without our earning it.  2. It provides our right to heaven. It is the only merit we can claim.