Skip to main content

HOW THE EARLY SEVENTH DAY SABBATH CHURCHES WERE CAPTURED BY THE MAJOR CHURCH IN ROME

By Nyron Medina
Excerpts taken from the aforementioned bookelet

The first movement to bring Sunday 
exaltation keeping to the seventh day 
Sabbath keeping churches happened over the Neo-Pasach or New Passover (called the Lord's supper) being perverted. This is what we were told about the New Passover. As “often” as we keep it; we were not given a day or any stipulated date. 1 Corinthians 11:23-26.

10. However, there were two separate times in which the New Passover was kept in the early church.
a. One was on every seventh day Sabbath, which is “as oft” as the church wanted it.
b. The other was on the 14th of the first month, Nisan, the date of the death of Jesus on the cross.

11. Here is the keeping of the New Passover on every seventh day Sabbath. It is called the “sacred mysteries”.
“Almost all churches throughout the world celebrate the sacred mysteries [the Lord's supper] on the Sabbath of every week ... Socrates, Ecclesiastical History, book 5, chap. 22.
12. Here is the keeping of the New Passover on the 14th day of the first month Nisan of each year. Polycrates, near the end of the second century, said.
“He (John) fell asleep at Ephesus. And 
Polycarp in Smyrna, who was a bishop 
and martyr. ... All these observed the 
fourteenth day of the Passover [Pascha] 
according to the Gospel, deviating in no 
respect, but following the rule of faith.” 
Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, book V. Chap. XXIV, secs. 1 to 6.

13. To understand how the New Passover 
was used to bring Sunday exaltation to the 
seventh day Sabbath keeping churches, we need to focus a bit on something called Gnosticism. This heresy which is the first trumpet was warned against by various writers of the Bible. Acts 20:26-31; 2 Peter 2:1-3,17-22; Jude 4.

14. Where did Gnosticism originate and take on the forms of Christianity? We are told that this occurred at Alexandria in Egypt.
“The place where this striving developed 
into a great system was at Alexandria in Egypt. Here there was an intermingling 
of the different religions of the empire, 
out of which finally grew a great system known as Gnosticism. The greatest 
influence in this movement was the 
affiliation of the different schools and 
religions at Alexandria—one of the 
greatest university cities in the world at 
the beginning of the Christian era. Here 
nearly every religion had its school of learning, and here the teachers and the students of these different faiths mingled and discussed their philosophies and 
religious ideas. As a result they fused 
their beliefs into a conglomerate mass of opinions that later spread throughout the Christian church.” W.E. Straw, Origin of Sunday Observance, p. 39.

It was Gnosticism that honored Sunday 
exaltation first in honor of the sun which was their Christ. We are told.

“When did they worship this deity? 
Neander says, They celebrated the Sunday every week, not on account of its reference into the resurrection of Christ, for that would have been inconsistent with their Docetism, but as the day consecrated to the sun, which was in fact their Christ.” Ibid, pp. 42-43.

Gnosticism eventually became fused 
with the forms of Christianity at 
Alexandria, and thus became known 
as Christian gnosticism, the type of 
Christianity existent in Alexandria by 
the second century A.C.B.

“Gnosticism evidently had a great influence upon the church members at Alexandria, for whenever we hear from any of them during the first two centuries, it is from men who strongly manifest the sentiments of the Gnostics.” Ibid, p. 47.
The three major men who came from 
Alexandrian Gnosticism with the 
Alexandrian brand of Christianity, 
were the men who gave us the first 
of the major perversion of the Sabbath.

“Barnabas, Justin, and Clement are three great men of the church [all recognized as Catholic Church Fathers] who were tinged with Gnosticism. They are also the three who gave us our first information regarding Sunday observance.” Ibid, p. 55.
The following is true from Christian 
Gnosticism from Alexandria.

i. Barnabas is the first to call the first 
day of the week (Sunday) after the 
Sabbath of the seventh day, the eight day of the week, and he related it to the resurrection of Jesus.
ii. Justin follows Barnabas in calling 
the first day of the week the eight. But he says that it had a certain 
mysterious regard.
iii. Clement of Alexandria becomes the very first person to call Sunday the first day of the week the Lord's day, while he rejects the seventh day 
Sabbath.

19. But the point is, that it was Christian 
Gnosticism from Alexandria that infiltrated the churches at Rome and eventually 
polluted their faith and changed their 
Religious image. Thus the religion of the church of Rome did not originate from 
Peter or the other apostles, it came from 
Alexandrian Gnosticism. We are told.

“Although semi-Gnostic ideas seem to 
have appeared among Christians first 
at Alexandria, yet it is not long before we see an effort put forth to establish them 
at Rome, the capital of the empire. 
Valentinus went from Alexandria to Rome and labored for some twenty years during the first half of the second century. 
Basilides had a large following at both 
Alexandria and Rome.” W.E. Straw, Origin of Sunday Observance, p. 44.

20. Now that the leaders of the various 
churches in the city of Rome were 
infiltrated with Gnosticism, it must be 
understood that they did not hold Sunday exaltation in honor of sun worship, they held it in honor of the resurrection of Christ as a secondary thing. Here is the real meaning of Sunday exaltation in its first theology.

“Further, He verily says to them: “Your 
new moons, and your Sabbaths, I cannot bear.” See how He says: The present 
Sabbath are not acceptable to Me, but those [are acceptable] which I have made, in which, having made all things rest, 
I shall make the eight day a beginning, 
that is, a beginning of another world. Wherefore, also, we celebrate the eight day in festivity, on which also Jesus rose from the dead; and having manifested Himself, He ascended into the heavens.” The 
Epistle of Barnabas, Chap. XV.

“But Sunday is the day on which we all hold our common assembly, because it is the first day on which God, having wrought a change in the darkness and matter, made the world; and Jesus Christ our Saviour on the same day rose from the dead.” Justin Martyr, First Apology, Chap. LXVII.
a. Thus we see that the first day of 
the week meant the following major concepts, to Christian Gnosticism.

i. The beginning of another world, i.e., a new world order.
ii. A change in darkness and matter, 
making the world, i.e., the making of a new world.
iii. The resurrection of Christ was a 
secondary meaning.

b. This is precisely why we are told that Sunday has a mysterious import the Sabbath day did not have.
“It is possible for us to show how 
the eight day possessed a certain 
mysterious import, which the seventh day did not possess …” Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho, Chap, XXIV.

21. Thus Sunday exaltation called the eight day really meant the following to Christian Gnostics and the Church of Rome.
a. The first day was merely the beginning of the creation of a new world. Genesis 1:1,2,5.
b. The first day was the separation of light from darkness, or the creation of light. Genesis 1:3-5.
c. Thus the first day (called the eight day) symbolized an unfinished creation, but with light existing to guide one onwards in creating.
d. Thus to Sunday exaltation keepers the first day symbolizes their efforts to take the first light and go forward creating a new world according to their ideas.

22. It was with this meaning that the church at Rome decided to exalt Sunday to seventh day Sabbath keeping churches, to capture these churches and make them over in their own image, in order to take over 
the Roman Empire they had made into a new world. A bishop of a church in Rome heavily corrupted by Alexandrian Christian Gnosticism set a plot in motion to capture seventh day Sabbath keeping churches with Sunday exaltation. He formulated 
a new concept of the New Passover. 
Here is Rome's new concept of the Passover 
contrasted with the previously two existing two concept of it that brought no conflict to the early church.

i. A passover on the Sabbath day.
ii. A passover on the 14th of Nisan of each year.
iii. A passover on a Sunday of each year expressing the resurrection of Christ. (Rome's idea).

Here is what the bishop of Rome did 
to create a Sunday passover under the 
influence of Gnostical Christianity.

a. He chose a day in the first month of 
Nisan after the 14th.
b. This day would be the first Sunday 
after the full moon and 14th of the first month.
c. This day will be dedicated to the 
celebration of the bread and wine, 
not in honor of Christ’s death, but in honor of His Resurrection.
d. The day was called the name Easter (Ishtar) after the name of the moon 
goddess that was worshipped on the 
full moon of that month.

24. We are told of the men who executed the Sunday Passover plan that would capture the churches and eventually make a new world out of the Roman Empire—a city of God.
“According to the historical testimony cited above, this variation from earlier practice did not begin to manifest itself in the church of Rome as far back as the time of the apostles, but from the time of Bishop Xystus (early in the reign of Hadrian, A.D. 117-138). It developed further during the episcopates of his successors--Telesphorus, Hyginus, Pius I, Anicetus, and Soter—on to that of Victor I.” Robert L. Odom, Sabbath and Sunday in Early Christianity, pp. 116-117.
This is further confirmed, because 
Eusebius in his history book in the 
fourth century, going backwards tells us the following.

“We mean Anicetus, and Pius, and 
Hyginus, and Telesphorus, and Xystus. They neither observed it [Nisan 14] 
themselves, nor did they permit those 
after them to do so.” Eusebius, 
Ecclesiastical History, secs. 14-17.

Again, another early Christian writer 
by the name of Irenaeus confirms the 
order of those bishops of a church in 
Rome that sought to get churches to 
observe throughout the Roman Empire, 
a Sunday Passover. We are told:

“The Roman practice is traced by 
Irenaeus back from Victor I to variances, divergences, and innovations that had spring up in the observance of the 
ecclesiastical Pascha in the times of 
Victor's predecessors—Soter, Anicetus, 
Pius I, Hyginus, Telesphorus, and Xystus I (in the reign of Emperor Hadrian) and no further.” Robert L. Odem, Sabbath and Sunday in Early Christianity, p. 167.

27. Thus we are told that by the middle of the second century, a Sunday Passover began in a church in Rome, and began to spread to other churches as ordered by the bishop of that church in Rome who was seeking exaltation and power. So that it was Pius I in the chain of bishops of the church in Rome who first brought Sunday exaltation to the church. We are told.
“Though agitation for the Roman 
innovation may have begun during the 
episcopates of the Roman bishops Sixtus I and Telephorus (in the reign of Hadrian, AD 117 to138), Roman Catholic tradition definitely points to Pius I as the bishop who instituted the holding of the Lord's Supper on Sunday in the yearly celebration of the ecclesiastical Pascha. A well-known, unabridged, modern English dictionary has stated that Pius I is traditionally believed to have instituted the observance of Sunday by Christians.” Ibid, p. 107.

Thus we see that it was Pius I that brought Sunday exaltation to the seventh day 
Sabbath keeping Christian churches in Rome. He did it by the use of a Sunday Passover. Again we are told.

“There is a tradition that he [Pius] 
first caused Sunday to be observed 
by Christians. Pius I was bishop of 
the Roman church from about AD 143 
to 158.... One notable happening listed 
by Eusebius, bishop of Caesarea, in his Chronicon is this: ‘It was commanded by 
Pius that the Lord's resurrection should 
be celebrated on the Lord's day [Sunday], which was confirmed by later pontiffs.” Ibid, p. 108.

Still later to Pius I, Victor I also decreed that the passover should be celebrated on 
a Sunday as decreed by Rome. Many churches in Asia and other places refused, at which Victor, disfellowshipped all 
these churches as if he had control of them. This shows that a Sunday Passover was being used by the bishop of Rome to seize control of these seventh day Sabbath keeping churches. We are told.

“In the last decade of the second century Victor I, bishop of Rome, persuaded a few other bishops to join him in drawing up an ecclesiastical decree that Sunday should be made the principal day in the observance of the annual ecclesiastical Pascha. This aroused a storm of controversy …” Ibid, p. 162.
“The Roman party had deviated from ‘the tradition of an ancient custom’ by taking away from it something and adding to it something else. That is, the Roman 
party was charged with alteration and 
innovation in the celebration of the 
ecclesiastical Pascha. On the other hand, the Roman Church and its partisans 
insisted that the holding of the Lord's 
Supper should be deferred until the 
Sunday following Nisan 14, and that 
then the fast should be terminated. 
Victor I and the bishops siding with him drew up an ecclesiastical decree, that the mystery of the resurrection of the Lord should be celebrated on no other but the Lord's day [Sunday] and that we should 
observe the close of the paschal fast on this day only.” Ibid, p. 165.

30. Because the churches refused Victor I's command as erroneous, and that he did not have and authority to tell them what to do, he disfellowshipped all those churches.
“Thereupon Victor, who presided over 
the church at Rome, immediately 
attempted to cut off from the common 
unity the parishes of all Asia, with the churches that agreed with them, as 
heterodox, and he wrote letters and 
declared all the brethren there wholly 
excommunicated.” Ibid, p. 164.

Although the bishops of other churches spoke to Victor and by this restrained him, yet he was able to capture many churches to his Sunday Passover. Here is what we are told.
“Hence, the geographical areas represented by Eusebius as being on the Roman side in the time of Victor I were (1) Rome, (2) Gaul, (3) Pontus, (4) Osrhoene, (5) Alexandria, and (6) part of Palestine, plus (7) a man in Corinth.” Ibid, p. 170.
32. However the battle between Sunday 
Passover churches in the orbit of Rome, and other churches that observe a 14th 
Nisan Passover continued and would not be settled until the advent of Emperor 
Constantine many years later. Here is what we are told.

“And so the Paschal dispute was to remain unsettled until the nominal conversion 
of the Emperor Constantine I, who would make an imperial decree, in AD 325, to 
enforce the observance of Sunday by 
Christians as the big day of Paschal 
festivities.” Ibid, p. 174.

33. As the second and third centuries ended and the fourth began this Passover 
Sunday that was celebrated only on one Sunday of the year (the Sunday after the 14th of Nisan and the full moon), was 
decreed to be followed as a practice every Sunday by the church of Rome in a Church Council. Here is what we are told.

“The regional church council held C.A.D. 
305 at Elvira, near Granada, Spain, is 
the earliest synod on record for that 
country. One of more than forty 
ecclesiastics attending it was Hosius, 
bishop of Cordova, who later served the 
Roman Emperor Constantine I as his 
adviser on church affairs. He did not, 
however, preside at this synod. This 
council's more than eighty decrees are 
severe. Canon 21 decreed: If anyone 
dwelling in a city should not attend 
church on three Lord's day [Sunday], let him abstain [from the communion] for a short period, so that he may appear to 
be reproved. That is the first recorded 
instance of a church council legislating 
in favor of weekly observance of Sunday, and it is the earliest record of penalty being imposed upon anybody for not attending church on that day.” Ibid, 
p. 236.

This statement shows quite a lot about 
the churches in the Roman Empire being 
captured into Sunday exaltation keeping away from the seventh day Sabbath. These points need to be carefully considered.

i. Sometime in the third century, the Sunday Passover began to become a regular festival not to be kept only once a year, but to be kept every Sunday.
ii. What indeed is Sunday keeping as 
kept by all Sunday exalting churches? It is a Sunday Passover made a 
regular observance on the first day of each week—Sunday.
iii. Thus by the third and fourth centuries, many of the churches were keeping 
the seventh day Sabbath and at the same time observing a weekly Sunday Passover.

However it was Emperor Constantine 
under the influence of Sunday exaltation 
bishops that then decreed a Sunday law in 321 A.C.B. A Sunday law is merely a weekly Sunday Passover required by the law for all citizens to keep.

“The first Sunday law known to have 
been issued by a civil government was 
that decreed by Constantine the Great on March 7, 321.” Ibid, p. 255.

“Thus Constantine issued at least six civil edicts concerning Sunday observance: (1) the law of March 7, 321, which ordered courts tradesmen and townspeople to rest on Sunday: (2) a law in June of the same year, which permitted emancipation of slaves on Sunday.” Ibid, p. 257.
36. Clearly, a Sunday law is indeed a weekly Sunday Passover being made to imitate the rest provision of the seventh day Sabbath as required by law for all to observe. 
Observe this explanation chart.

Then Constantine also passed a law 
enforcing a yearly Sunday Passover for 
all the churches in the Roman Empire to 
keep. This act would capture dissident 
churches to the church in Rome for fear of 
penalty.

“What was in effect a Sunday law for 
Easter was issued in 325 by Constantine 
in the form of a lengthy imperial letter in connection with the Council of Nicaea.” Ibid, p. 256.

“ ... a law in 325 which enjoined upon all Christians strict adherence to the decision of the council of Nicaea concerning the 
annual celebration of the ecclesiastical Pascha on Sunday.” Ibid, 257.

“The synodical letter sent out by the 
Nicene Council stated that all the brethren in the East who have heretofore kept the [Paschal] festival when the Jews did, will henceforth conform to the Roman and to us. Since the time of Victor I the Roman bishops have decreed and anathematized, but their verbal blasts could not compel the Quartodecimans and others to conform to their dictates. Now Sylvester I, the 
Roman bishop, had the backing of a decree by a major synod and an edict by a civil power willing and ready to use the law-enforcing agencies of the state to punish dissenters. The Quartodecimans and 
others who differed with the Roman 
church in teaching and practice concerning the observance of the ecclesiastical Pascha now had to face a new opponent—the 
imperial might of Rome. The emperor's edict could be used as a cudgel to 
oppressed and destroy Christians who 
followed their convictions in this religious matter.” Ibid, p. 278.

38. This decree from the government indeed marked a turning point for the church of Rome, it now had the aid of the state to 
capture the churches that refused to 
accept its Sunday Passover and thus exalt Sunday against the seventh day Sabbath. We are told.

“But when the emperor convened the Council of Nicaea and collaborated with 
it against Arius and his followers, and against those Christians who observed the ecclesiastical Pascha on a day other then Sunday, it marked a major turning point in Church history.… This is the first example of civil punishment of heresy; and it is the beginning of a long succession of civil 
persecutions for all departures from the catholic faith.” Ibid, p. 279.

We can now summarize the results of 
the history we have looked in the following important points.

a. Easter Sunday is not a Sunday that 
celebrates the resurrection of Christ. It is a relic of a vehicle that was used by the church of Rome to capture seventh day Sabbath keeping churches and turn them into Sunday exaltation churches like Rome and Alexandria.

b. By decrees, councils, and the aid of 
the Roman government the church 
of Rome was able to use its Sunday Passover to capture and change seventh day keeping churches into churches 
exalting Sunday thus giving the church authority over them.

c. The church of Rome replaced the 
seventh day Sabbath by use of its 
yearly Sunday Passover, when it was made a weekly first day event reviling 
the seventh day Sabbath.

d. Sunday, the first day of the week, crouched as a passover, meant a new world. And so the church of Rome used it to bring a new world in the Roman world, a world in which the bishop of Rome had the assumed authority of Christ; and the Church took over the empire.
e. The final capture of all religions in the world will be attempted when a global Sunday law is enforced. This is the new world that Sunday as the first day means. FIN.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WHAT OUR INQUIRY ABOUT OURSELVES SHOULD BE?

WHAT OUR INQUIRY ABOUT OURSELVES  SHOULD BE? We are in the very last days, we are told that the last controversy will be very short. “We are standing on the threshold of great and solemn events. Prophecies are fulfilling. The last great conflict will be short, but terrible. Old controversies will be revived. New controversies will arise. We have a great work to do. Our ministerial work must not cease. The last warning must be given to the world. There is a special power in the presentation of the truth at the present time. How long will it last? Only a little while.” Ellen G. White, Selected Messages bk. 3, pg. 419. And in view of the lateness of time, what should be the inquiry of everyone? We are told: “The inquiry of everyone should be ‘whose am I? To whom do I owe allegiance? Is my heart renewed? Is my soul reformed? Are my sins forgiven? Will they be blotted out when the time of refreshing shall come?” Ibid, pg. 419. We must needs examine ourselves to see if we are

DID ELLEN G. WHITE EVER CALL THE S.D.A. CHURCH BABYLON IN ANY WAY? BY NYRON MEDINA

In the Bible is brought to view the following statement: “And after these things I  saw another angel come down from heaven, having great power; and the earth was  lightened with his glory. And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying,  Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird. For all  nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the  earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are  waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies. And I heard another voice  from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her  sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.” Revelation 18:1-4. Of this Scripture  we are told that it speaks about the Church, fallen because of sins. “In amazement  they [the people] hear the testimony that Babylon is the church,

IMPUTED AND IMPARTED RIGHTEOUSNESS EXPLAINED By Nyron Medina

IMPUTED AND IMPARTED RIGHTEOUSNESS  EXPLAINED By Nyron Medina Statement of the case 1. Imputed and imparted righteousness are usually seen as different things in apostate  theology; they are presented as happening either successively or at the very same time,  but they are presented as two different salvific functions.  “In this most illuminating paragraph, the writer traces two distinct phases in the process  of our salvation—two complementary aspects of the plan of redemption—which are in a  certain sense successive, but at the same time simultaneous; two different operations of  the same righteousness of Christ, which alone can satisfy the demands of divine justice  and make saints of us. Let us analyze in outline form these two phases:  A. THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF CHRIST BY WHICH WE ARE JUSTIFIED.  1. It is imputed to us, which is, credited, granted freely without our earning it.  2. It provides our right to heaven. It is the only merit we can claim.