Skip to main content

A STUDY OF PISTIS WHICH IS FAITH

By Nyron Medina

It is the word “Pistis” (Greek) that is translated “Faith” in the Second Witness of the Bible. James 2:1; 1 Timothy 4:6; Titus 1:1.
This word “Faith”—pistis in the Greek, is 
described as “hupostasis” in Heb 11:1. This word translated “substance” in the English 
Bible is explained by Greek scholars in the 
following way:

“[hupostasis] stands for the whole body 
of documents bearing on the ownership of a person’s property, deposited in the archives, and forming the evidence of ownership. 
These varied uses are at first sight somewhat perplexed but in all cases there is the central idea of something that underlies visible 
conditions and guarantees a future possession. And as this is the essential meaning in Heb. 11:1, we venture to suggest the translation “Faith is the titledeed of things hoped for.”” James Hope Moulton and George Milligan, The Vocabulary of the Greek Testament, p. 660.

3. The implications we can draw from this 
quotation are the following:

a. Pistis or Faith is the “titledeed.”
b. Pistis or Faith in Heb 11:1 is the “evidence.”
c. The “titledeed” is the “evidence” of things not seen.
d. Pistis of Faith is therefore a knowledge—evidence.
e. Revealed Truths is knowledge—evidence of unseen spiritual things.

4. In further looking at the word pistis as 
it is used in the Greek we must follow the 
restricted explanation given in the Bible in 
Hebrews 11:1. Scholars may propose different means, some to include “trust” “trustworthy” and “confidence”, however, when their 
explanations touches titledeed or a knowledge—evidence, then we know we have the right meaning of pistis in such 
statements. Here is proof.

“The usage of pistis in the papyri is usually 
legal, and its predominant meaning is “guarantee, security.” Ceslas Spicq, 
Theological Lexicon of the New Testament, 
p. 111.

“Faith, the proof of invisible realities (Heb 11:1), can be compared to … conviction … 
argument, exhibit, means of proof … but can also mean any sort of testimony ... and derives in the first instance from Aristotle’s definition of rhetoric: “Among the modes of persuasion … some are extrinsic to the art of persuasion e.g. testimony, confessions documents ….” Ibid, p. 111.

“This pistis is sometimes a formal obligation, an oath … which is a means of proof.” Ibid, 
p.111.

“The document embodying a pledge is itself a pistis.” Ibid, p. 111.
5. Again and again we are given meanings of 
pistis that is consistent with the words, proof, 
evidence or a knowledge—evidence.

“… or better, the collection of documents stored in the archives as surety and constituting the evidence for a property right …. Thus faith is the true title attesting to one’s ownership of the heavenly property that one hopes for …” Ibid, p. 112.
“… the papyri link pistis [faith] and aletheia [truth] …” Ibid, p. 114.
“A meaning that corresponds to that of 
pistis in classical Greek [is] surety, deposit, guarantee …” Ibid, p. 423.

6. In assessing the information given to us about pistis, in line with Hebrews 11:1. We can see these facts.
a. Pistis is used largely for a means of 
knowledge—evidence.
b. Pistis relates to things like documents that give a knowledge that is proof of real things though one may not have sensory perception of them.
c. Pistis relates to words of proof as a 
guarantee of realities.
d. All this builds up the case that Faith (Pistis is not believing and /or trusting, even though some may think so, it is simply 
revealed truths that provides evidence 
and that is the guarantee.

7. Now we can understand why the world’s 
foremost theologian made these following statements.

“These were always unpropitious periods in the Christian Church, when Christian histories of dogmatics and theology separated gnosis [knowledge] and pistis [faith]. Pistis rightly understood is gnosis; rightly understood the act of faith is also an act of knowledge. Faith means knowledge.” Karl Barth, Dogmatic in Outline, p. 23.
“Faith is knowledge; it is related to God’s 
Logos, and is therefore a thoroughly logical matter.” Ibid, p. 25.

8. Another scholar tells us what pistis really means.
“Yet faith is a kind of knowledge …. the writer [of Hebrews] is calling faith (pistis) … a kind of spiritual perception …” Geddes Mac Gregor, Gnosis, p. 82.
“Faith in God, which consists in the 
knowledge of God, is a unique kind of 
knowledge.” Ibid, p 122.

All this helps us to understand a rare and strange explanation of Faith given by Mrs. White in an article which she wrote. She said.
“What is Faith? “The substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen .” Hebrews 11:1. It is an assent of the understanding of God’s words which binds the heart in willing consecration and service to God, who gave the understanding, who moved the heart, who first drew the mind to view Christ on the cross of Calvary. Faith is rendering to God the intellectual powers, abandonment of the mind and will to God, and making Christ the only door to enter into the kingdom of heaven.” Ellen G. White, Danger of false ideas of justification by faith, Manuscript 36, 1890.
What Mrs. White statement means is the 
following points.

a. The Faith Mrs. White describes is the 
Faith when it becomes the individual 
Faith held in the mind and grasped by the understanding.

b. This Faith is the agreement of the 
understanding of God’s words that 
commits the person to God, thus there 
must be knowledge—evidence in the mind about the truths of Christ.

All this is why Mrs. White can call Faith “an intelligent understanding faith.”
“… when you have an intelligent understanding faith that his death makes it possible for you to cease from sin …” Ellen G. White, 
Review and Herald, July 24, 1888.
In a summary of this short study, we can say the following about the word “Pistis”

a. It is knowledge—evidence of spiritual things. (Hebrews 11:1; Proverbs 22:17-21).
b. It is the knowledge of the Spirit of Truth, or spiritual knowledge, the Spirit of Faith. (John 14:16-18; 2 Corinthians 4:13).
c. But it is the individual faith when it is 
the conviction—knowledge in the mind converting the opinions about God. (1 John 5:6,10; 1 John 2:27; Romans 12:2).

Fin.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WHAT OUR INQUIRY ABOUT OURSELVES SHOULD BE?

WHAT OUR INQUIRY ABOUT OURSELVES  SHOULD BE? We are in the very last days, we are told that the last controversy will be very short. “We are standing on the threshold of great and solemn events. Prophecies are fulfilling. The last great conflict will be short, but terrible. Old controversies will be revived. New controversies will arise. We have a great work to do. Our ministerial work must not cease. The last warning must be given to the world. There is a special power in the presentation of the truth at the present time. How long will it last? Only a little while.” Ellen G. White, Selected Messages bk. 3, pg. 419. And in view of the lateness of time, what should be the inquiry of everyone? We are told: “The inquiry of everyone should be ‘whose am I? To whom do I owe allegiance? Is my heart renewed? Is my soul reformed? Are my sins forgiven? Will they be blotted out when the time of refreshing shall come?” Ibid, pg. 419. We must needs examine ourselves to see if we are

DID ELLEN G. WHITE EVER CALL THE S.D.A. CHURCH BABYLON IN ANY WAY? BY NYRON MEDINA

In the Bible is brought to view the following statement: “And after these things I  saw another angel come down from heaven, having great power; and the earth was  lightened with his glory. And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying,  Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird. For all  nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the  earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are  waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies. And I heard another voice  from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her  sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.” Revelation 18:1-4. Of this Scripture  we are told that it speaks about the Church, fallen because of sins. “In amazement  they [the people] hear the testimony that Babylon is the church,

IMPUTED AND IMPARTED RIGHTEOUSNESS EXPLAINED By Nyron Medina

IMPUTED AND IMPARTED RIGHTEOUSNESS  EXPLAINED By Nyron Medina Statement of the case 1. Imputed and imparted righteousness are usually seen as different things in apostate  theology; they are presented as happening either successively or at the very same time,  but they are presented as two different salvific functions.  “In this most illuminating paragraph, the writer traces two distinct phases in the process  of our salvation—two complementary aspects of the plan of redemption—which are in a  certain sense successive, but at the same time simultaneous; two different operations of  the same righteousness of Christ, which alone can satisfy the demands of divine justice  and make saints of us. Let us analyze in outline form these two phases:  A. THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF CHRIST BY WHICH WE ARE JUSTIFIED.  1. It is imputed to us, which is, credited, granted freely without our earning it.  2. It provides our right to heaven. It is the only merit we can claim.