Skip to main content

INTRODUCTION TO THE BOOK OF DANIEL By Nyron Medina

God had warned Israel that obedience to His law would bring blessings. Deut. 28:1-14.

But disobedience would bring retribution (retributive judgment). Deut. 28:15-48.
God sent Nebuchadnezzer as judgments upon Judah because they (the Jews of Judah) were in much iniquity and had profaned the temple. (2 kin. 23:34-37; 2 Kin. 24:1-5); 2 Chr. 36:1-7.
The nation was captured and put to tribute. There were three captivities of the Jews. Daniel and the three Hebrews were in the first captivity (606 B.C.B.).
i. 1st. Captivity– Dan. 1:1,2.
ii. 2nd. Captivity– 2 Chr. 36:8-10; 2 Kin. 24:6-17.
iii. 3rd. Captivity– 2 Chr. 36:11-20; 2 Kin. 24:17-20; 2 Kin. 25:1-11.
Ezekiel and others were in the second captivity. Eze. 1:1,2.
Under the third attack the nation was destroyed and its sanctuary (586 B.C.B.). See the third siege No. 4.
God placed Daniel as His minister of the gospel in the courts of Babylon (while Ezekiel was by the captives of the Jews in the land where they were placed, and while Jeremiah was yet in Judah before it was totally destroyed.).
God showed to Daniel what would be the future. Would Gentile kingdoms rule the world forever or would His eternal kingdom be set up? His judgment would cause kingdoms to rise and fall until the final judgment which will establish the eternal kingdom.
The theme of the book of Daniel is “Judgment” it shows general (retributive) judgment upon nations until the final pre-advent judgment (the Investigative Judgment) is to determine the setting up of the final eternal messianic kingdom. Dan. 2:29-45. This is the key text.
There are nine judgments. One is Retributive Judgment. Ps. 103:6.
Another is the Investigative Judgment. Rev. 11:18,19; 1 Jn. 4:17; Jam. 2:8-13; Jam. 5:20; Gal. 5:5.
The book of Daniel is primarily about the final pre-advent judgment. The Investigative Judgment. This is the high point of all its prophetic events parts. Dan. 2:44,45; Dan. 7:9,10,13,14,22; Dan. 8:14,26; Dan. 12:1,12.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

WHAT OUR INQUIRY ABOUT OURSELVES SHOULD BE?

WHAT OUR INQUIRY ABOUT OURSELVES  SHOULD BE? We are in the very last days, we are told that the last controversy will be very short. “We are standing on the threshold of great and solemn events. Prophecies are fulfilling. The last great conflict will be short, but terrible. Old controversies will be revived. New controversies will arise. We have a great work to do. Our ministerial work must not cease. The last warning must be given to the world. There is a special power in the presentation of the truth at the present time. How long will it last? Only a little while.” Ellen G. White, Selected Messages bk. 3, pg. 419. And in view of the lateness of time, what should be the inquiry of everyone? We are told: “The inquiry of everyone should be ‘whose am I? To whom do I owe allegiance? Is my heart renewed? Is my soul reformed? Are my sins forgiven? Will they be blotted out when the time of refreshing shall come?” Ibid, pg. 419. We must needs examine ourselves to see if we...
Post a Comment
Read more

IMPUTED AND IMPARTED RIGHTEOUSNESS EXPLAINED By Nyron Medina

IMPUTED AND IMPARTED RIGHTEOUSNESS  EXPLAINED By Nyron Medina Statement of the case 1. Imputed and imparted righteousness are usually seen as different things in apostate  theology; they are presented as happening either successively or at the very same time,  but they are presented as two different salvific functions.  “In this most illuminating paragraph, the writer traces two distinct phases in the process  of our salvation—two complementary aspects of the plan of redemption—which are in a  certain sense successive, but at the same time simultaneous; two different operations of  the same righteousness of Christ, which alone can satisfy the demands of divine justice  and make saints of us. Let us analyze in outline form these two phases:  A. THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF CHRIST BY WHICH WE ARE JUSTIFIED.  1. It is imputed to us, which is, credited, granted freely without our earning it.  2. It provides our r...
Post a Comment
Read more

EGW QUOTE ON SINFUL NATURE

We are told that Jesus had our “sinful nature.” “He took upon Him our sinful nature.” Ellen G. White, Signs of the Times, 7/30/02. “In him was no guile nor sinfulness,….yet He took upon Him our sinful nature.” Ibid. From what we have just read, we see that the term “sinful nature” for Mrs. White does not mean that the person has sin for she says that Jesus was sinfree. But what does sinful nature mean that the person? A. It means human nature affected by sin not infected with  sin. B. It means human nature weakened by sin, but not resided by sin. C. This is the Mind, Emotions/Passions, Flesh and Experience weakened by sin, but not necessarily indwelt by sin. D. It is quite true that man’s sinful nature, a nature weakened by sin, in the average sinner may have sin in it. So sinful nature for the sinner in sin is a nature weakened by sin, but the man has sin in this nature. E. This means the man has sin in his Mind, Passions/Emotions, Experience, and sin in his flesh is sin in his Mi...
Post a Comment
Read more