Skip to main content

REVELATION STUDIES By Nyron Medina

The doctrine held by Rome, which Luther condemned despite how this doctrine was structured, was in fact “justification by works”. Here is Luther exposing and condemning this species of justification.
“Wherefore those things which the popish schoolmen have taught concerning the justifying faith being furnished with charity; are nothing else but mere dreams. For that faith which apprehendeth Christ the Son of God, and is furnished with him, is the same faith that justifieth, and not that faith which includeth charity.” Ibid, pg. 98-99.
Wherefore the wicked and pernicious opinion of the Papists is utterly condemned, which attribute the merit of grace and remission of sins to the work wrought. For they say that a good work before grace, is able to obtain grace of congruence [which they call meritum de congruo because it is meet that God should reward such work]. But when grace is obtained, the work following deserveth everlasting life of due debt and worthiness [which they call meritum de condigno]. As for example: if a man being in deadly sin, without grace, do a good work of his own good natural inclination – that is , if he say or hear a mass, or give alms and such like – this man of congruence deserveth grace. When he hath thus obtained grace, he doth now a work which of worthiness deserveth everlasting life.” Ibid, pg. 121.
xii. Thus it is clearly seen that the species of justification taught by the Roman Catholic in Luther’s time is not to be called subjective or inner transformation even though they may use such words as “infused”. This species of justification is not an inner change, but merely a works derived acceptance by God, it is justification by works.
1. A good work before grace obtains grace.
2. God rewards such works.
3. After grace is obtained the work following merits or deserves eternal life.
4. A man in sin without grace do a good work out of his own natural good inclination.
5. He deserves grace.
6. When he gets the grace any good works makes him worthy of eternal life.
xiii. This is clearly a fictious justification so it has no real change in it.
1. We are not justified by any human works for to seek to be meritorious or earn salvation. Rom. 4:1,2,4.
2. Justification cannot be by works. Gal. 2:16.
3. It is God that justifies. Rom. 8:33.
4. God uses the instrument of Faith to justify us. Gal. 3:8.
5. The Faith that justifies us motivates us to the keeping of the Law of God. Rom. 3:31.
6. The justification we undergo by God actually changes the character, and makes us righteous instead of and in place of sinfulness. (Rom. 8:6; Rom. 5:1).
7. Thus we teach a change – oriented justification. 1 Cor. 6:9-11.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WHAT OUR INQUIRY ABOUT OURSELVES SHOULD BE?

WHAT OUR INQUIRY ABOUT OURSELVES  SHOULD BE? We are in the very last days, we are told that the last controversy will be very short. “We are standing on the threshold of great and solemn events. Prophecies are fulfilling. The last great conflict will be short, but terrible. Old controversies will be revived. New controversies will arise. We have a great work to do. Our ministerial work must not cease. The last warning must be given to the world. There is a special power in the presentation of the truth at the present time. How long will it last? Only a little while.” Ellen G. White, Selected Messages bk. 3, pg. 419. And in view of the lateness of time, what should be the inquiry of everyone? We are told: “The inquiry of everyone should be ‘whose am I? To whom do I owe allegiance? Is my heart renewed? Is my soul reformed? Are my sins forgiven? Will they be blotted out when the time of refreshing shall come?” Ibid, pg. 419. We must needs examine ourselves to see if we...

MRS WHITE QUOTES ON THE 1888 MESSAGE REJECTION

1. “The Lord in His great mercy sent a most precious message to His people through Elders Waggoner and Jones.” — TM p. 91. 2. “God gave to His servants a testimony that presented the truth as it is in Jesus, which is the third angel’s message, in clear distinct lines” — TM p. 93. 3. “The message of the gospel of His grace was to be given to the church in clear and distinct lines, that the world should no longer say that Seventh-Day Adventists talk the law, the law, but do not teach or believe Christ. The efficacy of the blood of Christ was to be presented to the people with freshness and power.” — TM p. 92. 4. “This is the very work which the Lord designs that the message He has given His servants, shall perform in the heart and mind of every human agent….God gave to His messengers just what the people needed.” — TM p. 95. 5. “The Lord would have these grand themes studied in our churches, and if every church member shall give entrance to the word of God it will give light and...

EGW QUOTE ON SINFUL NATURE

We are told that Jesus had our “sinful nature.” “He took upon Him our sinful nature.” Ellen G. White, Signs of the Times, 7/30/02. “In him was no guile nor sinfulness,….yet He took upon Him our sinful nature.” Ibid. From what we have just read, we see that the term “sinful nature” for Mrs. White does not mean that the person has sin for she says that Jesus was sinfree. But what does sinful nature mean that the person? A. It means human nature affected by sin not infected with  sin. B. It means human nature weakened by sin, but not resided by sin. C. This is the Mind, Emotions/Passions, Flesh and Experience weakened by sin, but not necessarily indwelt by sin. D. It is quite true that man’s sinful nature, a nature weakened by sin, in the average sinner may have sin in it. So sinful nature for the sinner in sin is a nature weakened by sin, but the man has sin in this nature. E. This means the man has sin in his Mind, Passions/Emotions, Experience, and sin in his flesh is sin in his Mi...