Skip to main content

BEING "BORN OF THE WATER" (JOHN 3:5) DOES NOT MEAN WATER BAPTISM

One is not reborn or born again by water baptism. The term "Born of the water " does not mean water baptism, as the literal water in it cannot change a person's heart/mind. The water in water baptism is only symbolic of Christ, or the word of God, and is not the actual thing that saves the person or transforms the heart.
The term "born of the water" is similar in symbolism to water baptism, however they are not one and the same. Being "born of the water" is a symbolic way of describing the spiritual reality of being morally renewed in the experience of the mind by God through His word, when one is truly repentant, while water baptism is a symbolic ritual done by man to symbolize the work that was done by God in renewing the mind. The symbolic term "born of the water" which refers to being re-born within by the word is not dependent on water baptism, as if to think water baptism initiated the born again experience. No action or work of man can initiate the work of God to transform a person. Furthermore only God alone knows if a person is truly repentant, that he may bestow renewing grace to that person. We are to understand that though we are commanded by God to do the ritual of water baptism, this is not what transforms us, it is the word of God preached to us in the gospel that converts our hearts.
In the same way as "water baptism" the ceremony of circumcision never saved a person or converted a person's heart/mind or made them righteous within. This Paul sought to prove by his arguments (in and around Rom.4:10,11; Gal.2:16; Gal.3:1-3; Rom.2:28) against the ideology of the Jews (Acts 15:1), it was always by the revealed word of God or the faith that a person was converted or born again (Eph.5:26, James 1:18, 1 Peter 1:23) or made righteous (See Col. 3:9,10; Eph.4:23,24). Paul presses home this point when he asks the question as to when Abraham received righteousness through faith? (which in Rom.4:5 & 7 is expressed as justification or forgiveness), he asks, when he was in circumcision or un-circumcision? Paul answers by saying when he was in un-circumcision. And continues by saying he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the Righteousness of the faith which he had, yet being un-circumcised. Thus even before a repentant, believing person is water baptized they would also (as with circumcision) have the seal of the Righteousness of faith in being saved.
WHAT DOES "THE WATER" REPRESENT IN 'BORN OF THE WATER" IN JOHN 3:5, AND WHAT IT MEANS TO BE BORN OF THE WATER.
The water in Jn 3:5 represents the word, Eph 5:25 & 26 tells us Christ sanctify and cleanse the church by the washing of water by the word. Here we see a "washing by the word" so the word washes spiritually, also Ezek. 36:25 tells us "Then will I sprinkle clean water upon you and you shall be clean: from all your filthiness and from all your idols, will I cleanse you. Thus again we see a spiritual washing/cleansing by the water of the word. Furthermore we are told in Jn 17:17 "Sanctify them through thy word thy word is truth" confirming that sanctification is by the word, as we were also told in Eph.5:26. Jn 15:3 says "Now ye are clean through the word I have spoken unto you" this confirms that we are cleansed by the word, just as we were told before in Eph. 5:26 and also that the water that cleanses spiritually in Ezek.36:25 is the word. All these evidences show that the water represents the word of God which washes, cleanses and cleans a person spiritually from their filthiness and their idols. Thus to be born of the water is to be born of the word. This is consistent with 1Pet 1:23 which tells us "Be born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God,which liveth and abideth forever and Jam 1:18 which tells us that we are begotten by the word of truth. Identifying that "the word" is that thing that we are born of, so to be born--again which is to be born of the water is to be born of the word.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

WHAT OUR INQUIRY ABOUT OURSELVES SHOULD BE?

WHAT OUR INQUIRY ABOUT OURSELVES  SHOULD BE? We are in the very last days, we are told that the last controversy will be very short. “We are standing on the threshold of great and solemn events. Prophecies are fulfilling. The last great conflict will be short, but terrible. Old controversies will be revived. New controversies will arise. We have a great work to do. Our ministerial work must not cease. The last warning must be given to the world. There is a special power in the presentation of the truth at the present time. How long will it last? Only a little while.” Ellen G. White, Selected Messages bk. 3, pg. 419. And in view of the lateness of time, what should be the inquiry of everyone? We are told: “The inquiry of everyone should be ‘whose am I? To whom do I owe allegiance? Is my heart renewed? Is my soul reformed? Are my sins forgiven? Will they be blotted out when the time of refreshing shall come?” Ibid, pg. 419. We must needs examine ourselves to see if we are
Post a Comment
Read more

DID ELLEN G. WHITE EVER CALL THE S.D.A. CHURCH BABYLON IN ANY WAY? BY NYRON MEDINA

In the Bible is brought to view the following statement: “And after these things I  saw another angel come down from heaven, having great power; and the earth was  lightened with his glory. And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying,  Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird. For all  nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the  earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are  waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies. And I heard another voice  from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her  sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.” Revelation 18:1-4. Of this Scripture  we are told that it speaks about the Church, fallen because of sins. “In amazement  they [the people] hear the testimony that Babylon is the church,
1 comment
Read more

IMPUTED AND IMPARTED RIGHTEOUSNESS EXPLAINED By Nyron Medina

IMPUTED AND IMPARTED RIGHTEOUSNESS  EXPLAINED By Nyron Medina Statement of the case 1. Imputed and imparted righteousness are usually seen as different things in apostate  theology; they are presented as happening either successively or at the very same time,  but they are presented as two different salvific functions.  “In this most illuminating paragraph, the writer traces two distinct phases in the process  of our salvation—two complementary aspects of the plan of redemption—which are in a  certain sense successive, but at the same time simultaneous; two different operations of  the same righteousness of Christ, which alone can satisfy the demands of divine justice  and make saints of us. Let us analyze in outline form these two phases:  A. THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF CHRIST BY WHICH WE ARE JUSTIFIED.  1. It is imputed to us, which is, credited, granted freely without our earning it.  2. It provides our right to heaven. It is the only merit we can claim. 
Post a Comment
Read more