Skip to main content

WHAT IS GALATIANS SPEAKING ABOUT

Evangelicals need to understand Galatians 4:24 is not saying the ten commandments gendereth to bondage. I quote Gal.4:23-24
Gal.4:23,24,26
"23 But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise.
24 Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar.
26 But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all.

The covenant from Mount Sinai that gendereth to bondage, is what Paul called the old covenant which consisted of symbolic rituals, ceremonies and feasts. These existed to teach Spiritual realities of the plan of salvation and existed alongside the Spiritual Covenant of Righteousness by faith. The old covenant entailing symbolic observances gendereth to bondage because of the hardness of the Jewish heart the symbolic observances began to be seen as a means to salvation instead of the Spiritual Covenant of Righteousness by faith. I quote Gal.4:9-10
"Gal.4:9-10
9But now, after that ye have known God, or rather are known of God, how turn ye again to the weak and beggarly elements, whereunto ye desire again to be in bondage?
10 Ye observe days, and months, and times, and years."

Acts 15:1
And certain men which came down from Judea taught the brethren, and said, Except ye be circumcised after the manner of Moses, ye cannot be saved.

Paul makes a distinction between what is nothing and what is something in regards to its necessity for salvation. Take note:
1Cor.7:19
Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but the keeping of the commandments of God.

Circumcision is part of the old covenant and and is nothing in regards to its necessity for salvation. Thus the point Paul makes against the old covenant (gendering to bondage) does not nullify commandment keeping, for the old covenant has nothing do with the ten commandments, the two are distinct and different to each other.
P.S
Note also two other texts that Paul gives us as to what is nothing and what is something in regards to its necessity for salvation.

Gal.5:6
"For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love."

Gal.6:15
"For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision, but a new creation. (similar to 2 Cor.5:17,18 - Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creation: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new.18 And all things are of God, ..)

These texts which speak of the new creation as something are dealing with the issue of conversion or salvation of heart by Righteousness within by faith (the revealed truths) - the gospel of Christ. This is the Spiritual Covenant, and is the transformation or the conversion from having the carnal mind; that is not subject to the law of God; to the Spiritual mind that is subject to the law of God (Rom.8:6-7 explains the carnal mind is not subject to the law of God while Rom.8:8-10 & 1John 4:24 shows that the Spiritual mind keeps the commandments). Thus Paul refers to the Spiritual or New Covenant (new in the contest of reinstated) as being the Jerusalem that is above that is the mother of us all in Gal.4:26. The Spiritual Covenant brings us into the experience of life in God, it births us and is thus is likened to our mother.
This why Gal.4:23 & 28 speaks of us as being the children of the promise. See Gal.3:5-7 & 14 which explains the children of the promise are those that are of justified by faith and blessed with faithful Abraham by receiving the promise of the Spirit by faith.
The new birth through Righteousness by faith is God's heart intent of Love or His covenant (really testament) towards us and is Grace in the tender affectionate mercies of compassion of God towards us.
May you all be blessed by this study in Jesus name Amen.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

WHAT OUR INQUIRY ABOUT OURSELVES SHOULD BE?

WHAT OUR INQUIRY ABOUT OURSELVES  SHOULD BE? We are in the very last days, we are told that the last controversy will be very short. “We are standing on the threshold of great and solemn events. Prophecies are fulfilling. The last great conflict will be short, but terrible. Old controversies will be revived. New controversies will arise. We have a great work to do. Our ministerial work must not cease. The last warning must be given to the world. There is a special power in the presentation of the truth at the present time. How long will it last? Only a little while.” Ellen G. White, Selected Messages bk. 3, pg. 419. And in view of the lateness of time, what should be the inquiry of everyone? We are told: “The inquiry of everyone should be ‘whose am I? To whom do I owe allegiance? Is my heart renewed? Is my soul reformed? Are my sins forgiven? Will they be blotted out when the time of refreshing shall come?” Ibid, pg. 419. We must needs examine ourselves to see if we...
Post a Comment
Read more

IMPUTED AND IMPARTED RIGHTEOUSNESS EXPLAINED By Nyron Medina

IMPUTED AND IMPARTED RIGHTEOUSNESS  EXPLAINED By Nyron Medina Statement of the case 1. Imputed and imparted righteousness are usually seen as different things in apostate  theology; they are presented as happening either successively or at the very same time,  but they are presented as two different salvific functions.  “In this most illuminating paragraph, the writer traces two distinct phases in the process  of our salvation—two complementary aspects of the plan of redemption—which are in a  certain sense successive, but at the same time simultaneous; two different operations of  the same righteousness of Christ, which alone can satisfy the demands of divine justice  and make saints of us. Let us analyze in outline form these two phases:  A. THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF CHRIST BY WHICH WE ARE JUSTIFIED.  1. It is imputed to us, which is, credited, granted freely without our earning it.  2. It provides our r...
Post a Comment
Read more

EGW QUOTE ON SINFUL NATURE

We are told that Jesus had our “sinful nature.” “He took upon Him our sinful nature.” Ellen G. White, Signs of the Times, 7/30/02. “In him was no guile nor sinfulness,….yet He took upon Him our sinful nature.” Ibid. From what we have just read, we see that the term “sinful nature” for Mrs. White does not mean that the person has sin for she says that Jesus was sinfree. But what does sinful nature mean that the person? A. It means human nature affected by sin not infected with  sin. B. It means human nature weakened by sin, but not resided by sin. C. This is the Mind, Emotions/Passions, Flesh and Experience weakened by sin, but not necessarily indwelt by sin. D. It is quite true that man’s sinful nature, a nature weakened by sin, in the average sinner may have sin in it. So sinful nature for the sinner in sin is a nature weakened by sin, but the man has sin in this nature. E. This means the man has sin in his Mind, Passions/Emotions, Experience, and sin in his flesh is sin in his Mi...
Post a Comment
Read more