Skip to main content

HOW THE FALSE JUSTIFICATION MAKES EVANGELICALS HATE THE SABBATH

1. Here is an account of the Evangelicals' false justification doctrine of begin justified and yet
remaining in sin.

"Like Paul, every true believer struggles with indwelling sin ... No believer is able to understand why he sins; it is a mystery beyond his reach ... The renewed man condemns himself, and justifies God, even while he confesses and mourns his inability to conform to the divine requisitions ... Every believer is assured of deliverance from indwelling sin through Christ Jesus, but not while living in this body of sin ... Paul looked for deliverance from indwelling sin but not while in the flesh, and neither can we." D. N. Steele, C. C. Thomas, Romans, An
Interpreted Outline, pg. 60,61.

2. The Sabbath is a fruit - sign of Sanctification. Ex. 31:13.
3. It is kept through the whole of its twenty-four hours being involved in keeping the Law, or
being sinless. Isa. 58:13; Isa. 56:2,4,6.

4. Keeping the Law means that we love God. Ex. 20:6; 1 Jn. 5: 3.
5. Justification gives us the spiritual mind. (Rom. 8:6; Rom. 5: 1).
6. When we are Justified the old man of sin is slain and the body of sins is inactivated (passions) so that we are separated from sin. Rom. 6:6,7,11.
7. Thus Justification separates us from sin or sanctifies us initially. (Tit. 3:5-7; 1 Jn. 3:9).
8. Also, It makes us keep the Law of works. Rom. 3:28,30,31.
9. And this is exactly what the keeping of the Sabbath day is all about. Ex. 35:1-3.
10. Thus Justification, by changing us, makes us love God or keep the Law which is the experience of keeping the seventh day Sabbath.
11. Whosoever therefore loves God through Justification will love to keep the Sabbath - day.
(Rom. 3:28,30,31; 1 Jn. 5:3; Ex. 31:13).

12. Thus it is sin that are in their lives that causes Evangelicals to not love sinfreeness , and thus not love to keep the Sabbath, but hate it.

THE END

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WHAT OUR INQUIRY ABOUT OURSELVES SHOULD BE?

WHAT OUR INQUIRY ABOUT OURSELVES  SHOULD BE? We are in the very last days, we are told that the last controversy will be very short. “We are standing on the threshold of great and solemn events. Prophecies are fulfilling. The last great conflict will be short, but terrible. Old controversies will be revived. New controversies will arise. We have a great work to do. Our ministerial work must not cease. The last warning must be given to the world. There is a special power in the presentation of the truth at the present time. How long will it last? Only a little while.” Ellen G. White, Selected Messages bk. 3, pg. 419. And in view of the lateness of time, what should be the inquiry of everyone? We are told: “The inquiry of everyone should be ‘whose am I? To whom do I owe allegiance? Is my heart renewed? Is my soul reformed? Are my sins forgiven? Will they be blotted out when the time of refreshing shall come?” Ibid, pg. 419. We must needs examine ourselves to see if we are

DID ELLEN G. WHITE EVER CALL THE S.D.A. CHURCH BABYLON IN ANY WAY? BY NYRON MEDINA

In the Bible is brought to view the following statement: “And after these things I  saw another angel come down from heaven, having great power; and the earth was  lightened with his glory. And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying,  Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird. For all  nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the  earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are  waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies. And I heard another voice  from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her  sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.” Revelation 18:1-4. Of this Scripture  we are told that it speaks about the Church, fallen because of sins. “In amazement  they [the people] hear the testimony that Babylon is the church,

IMPUTED AND IMPARTED RIGHTEOUSNESS EXPLAINED By Nyron Medina

IMPUTED AND IMPARTED RIGHTEOUSNESS  EXPLAINED By Nyron Medina Statement of the case 1. Imputed and imparted righteousness are usually seen as different things in apostate  theology; they are presented as happening either successively or at the very same time,  but they are presented as two different salvific functions.  “In this most illuminating paragraph, the writer traces two distinct phases in the process  of our salvation—two complementary aspects of the plan of redemption—which are in a  certain sense successive, but at the same time simultaneous; two different operations of  the same righteousness of Christ, which alone can satisfy the demands of divine justice  and make saints of us. Let us analyze in outline form these two phases:  A. THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF CHRIST BY WHICH WE ARE JUSTIFIED.  1. It is imputed to us, which is, credited, granted freely without our earning it.  2. It provides our right to heaven. It is the only merit we can claim.