Skip to main content

The writer is addresing the General Conference position sited in. Priorities, Jan 2012, Jo Ann Davidson, God in Three persons-Blessed Tŕinity.

"ECHARD" IS NUMERICAL ONE.
The writer is addresing the General Conference position sited in. Priorities, Jan 2012, Jo Ann Davidson, God in Three persons-Blessed Tŕinity.
t Excerpts taken from Catholic and Adventist Trinity 3 vs 1 by Nyron Medina.
29. Another fact about God is that He is numerically one, yet here is what the GC Adventists tell us:
“The English word ‘one’ is used to translate two words in biblical Hebrews: yahid
(unique, only son, Genesis 22:2) and echad (those united in marriage ‘become one in
flesh’ Genesis 2:24). ‘The Lord our God is on ‘translates echad, and means God is not
solitary, even though He is unique. It suggests that God is united, or more than one
Person.” Ibid p. 21
i. They have used one of the Hebrew words for one “echad” without inspiration to
suggest that this is saying that God is more than one person but is united.
ii. This reinforces the erroneous idea that God is three divine persons.
30. However the word “echad” literally means one like the number 1 (one) here is the proof.
i. When God says He is one (echad) YHWH, the word cannot be united or a united
YHWH. Deuteronomy 6:4
ii. Echad means one like the number one as it is evident in these Scriptures.
Genesis 48:22; Numbers 28:4; Deuteronomy 12:14; Deuteronomy 17:4; Joshua
10:2; Joshua 12:21; 2Samuel 12:3; Psalms 53:3; Jeremiah 52:21, 22.
iii. When echad is used for a united one, the issue is not the “united
but that the plural amount is as the number one. So numerical one is used to
show oneness. Judges 20:8; 2 Samuel 2:25.
iv. Thus God is one God and this is numerically one like the number one. Galatians
3:20
Emphasis supplied.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

WHAT OUR INQUIRY ABOUT OURSELVES SHOULD BE?

WHAT OUR INQUIRY ABOUT OURSELVES  SHOULD BE? We are in the very last days, we are told that the last controversy will be very short. “We are standing on the threshold of great and solemn events. Prophecies are fulfilling. The last great conflict will be short, but terrible. Old controversies will be revived. New controversies will arise. We have a great work to do. Our ministerial work must not cease. The last warning must be given to the world. There is a special power in the presentation of the truth at the present time. How long will it last? Only a little while.” Ellen G. White, Selected Messages bk. 3, pg. 419. And in view of the lateness of time, what should be the inquiry of everyone? We are told: “The inquiry of everyone should be ‘whose am I? To whom do I owe allegiance? Is my heart renewed? Is my soul reformed? Are my sins forgiven? Will they be blotted out when the time of refreshing shall come?” Ibid, pg. 419. We must needs examine ourselves to see if we are
Post a Comment
Read more

DID ELLEN G. WHITE EVER CALL THE S.D.A. CHURCH BABYLON IN ANY WAY? BY NYRON MEDINA

In the Bible is brought to view the following statement: “And after these things I  saw another angel come down from heaven, having great power; and the earth was  lightened with his glory. And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying,  Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird. For all  nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the  earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are  waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies. And I heard another voice  from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her  sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.” Revelation 18:1-4. Of this Scripture  we are told that it speaks about the Church, fallen because of sins. “In amazement  they [the people] hear the testimony that Babylon is the church,
1 comment
Read more

IMPUTED AND IMPARTED RIGHTEOUSNESS EXPLAINED By Nyron Medina

IMPUTED AND IMPARTED RIGHTEOUSNESS  EXPLAINED By Nyron Medina Statement of the case 1. Imputed and imparted righteousness are usually seen as different things in apostate  theology; they are presented as happening either successively or at the very same time,  but they are presented as two different salvific functions.  “In this most illuminating paragraph, the writer traces two distinct phases in the process  of our salvation—two complementary aspects of the plan of redemption—which are in a  certain sense successive, but at the same time simultaneous; two different operations of  the same righteousness of Christ, which alone can satisfy the demands of divine justice  and make saints of us. Let us analyze in outline form these two phases:  A. THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF CHRIST BY WHICH WE ARE JUSTIFIED.  1. It is imputed to us, which is, credited, granted freely without our earning it.  2. It provides our right to heaven. It is the only merit we can claim. 
Post a Comment
Read more