Skip to main content

BUGGERY LAWS IN TRINIDAD

The UNGodly and Unconstitutional arguement for the removal of the buggery laws of Trinidad and Tobago. (By Roger Hume - Research Officer of the Thusian Institute for Religious Liberty)
The main argument of the sodomite is that the buggery laws is unconstitutional therefore violates the rights of the sodomites. This argument is to cloth their unnatural sex practice as normal and the society must accept this as a right sex behavior. However, it is a misleading, wrong, and deceptive use of the word 'rights'. Rights are human rights. The first thing we must hold in our minds is that man was created by God. God created two genders: Male and Female. God made them with equal human rights. Thus rights comes from God, this mean that rights are inalienable. Our Constitution of Trinidad an Tobago acknowdges these truths and realties of humanity, existence in our society and nations of the earth. Therefore it is God who defines our understanding of rights. Rights are not actions, they are not doing things, they are life preserving principles of equality for all under law. Sodomites and actvitist who use the fallacious propaganda aguments claiming that the buggery laws are unconstitutional is invalid, for the buggery laws potect the venerable children, women and men from dangerous predators. Buggery is an unnatural sex activity. For our posterior was not created by God for sexual activity or for projectiles to be used as an activity there. These practices brings about many diseases. The removal of the buggery laws therefore will lead to public health crisis for many people who have been restrained by this law would have a legal justification to do these abominations thus inviting the judgement of God as had happened to the five cities on thw plain located around the dead sea. Sodom, Gommorah, Admah, Bela and Zeboim.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WHAT OUR INQUIRY ABOUT OURSELVES SHOULD BE?

WHAT OUR INQUIRY ABOUT OURSELVES  SHOULD BE? We are in the very last days, we are told that the last controversy will be very short. “We are standing on the threshold of great and solemn events. Prophecies are fulfilling. The last great conflict will be short, but terrible. Old controversies will be revived. New controversies will arise. We have a great work to do. Our ministerial work must not cease. The last warning must be given to the world. There is a special power in the presentation of the truth at the present time. How long will it last? Only a little while.” Ellen G. White, Selected Messages bk. 3, pg. 419. And in view of the lateness of time, what should be the inquiry of everyone? We are told: “The inquiry of everyone should be ‘whose am I? To whom do I owe allegiance? Is my heart renewed? Is my soul reformed? Are my sins forgiven? Will they be blotted out when the time of refreshing shall come?” Ibid, pg. 419. We must needs examine ourselves to see if we are

DID ELLEN G. WHITE EVER CALL THE S.D.A. CHURCH BABYLON IN ANY WAY? BY NYRON MEDINA

In the Bible is brought to view the following statement: “And after these things I  saw another angel come down from heaven, having great power; and the earth was  lightened with his glory. And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying,  Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird. For all  nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the  earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are  waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies. And I heard another voice  from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her  sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.” Revelation 18:1-4. Of this Scripture  we are told that it speaks about the Church, fallen because of sins. “In amazement  they [the people] hear the testimony that Babylon is the church,

IMPUTED AND IMPARTED RIGHTEOUSNESS EXPLAINED By Nyron Medina

IMPUTED AND IMPARTED RIGHTEOUSNESS  EXPLAINED By Nyron Medina Statement of the case 1. Imputed and imparted righteousness are usually seen as different things in apostate  theology; they are presented as happening either successively or at the very same time,  but they are presented as two different salvific functions.  “In this most illuminating paragraph, the writer traces two distinct phases in the process  of our salvation—two complementary aspects of the plan of redemption—which are in a  certain sense successive, but at the same time simultaneous; two different operations of  the same righteousness of Christ, which alone can satisfy the demands of divine justice  and make saints of us. Let us analyze in outline form these two phases:  A. THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF CHRIST BY WHICH WE ARE JUSTIFIED.  1. It is imputed to us, which is, credited, granted freely without our earning it.  2. It provides our right to heaven. It is the only merit we can claim.