Skip to main content

FATHER IN THE BIBLE. NYRON MEDINA

In the Bible, God is not the three persons of the Godhead, God is numerically one God. (Galatians 3:20; James 2:19). But He dwells 

in three persons officially; we know that He dwells in the persons because Jesus taught us this fact through His incarnation. We 
are told that “God was in Christ” (2 Corinthians 5:19), this, among others, is how we know that God dwells in the persons of the 
Father, the Son, and the Spirit. This one God in the three persons is called the Divine Nature (2 Peter 1:4), and so we shall call Him. 
Furthermore this God the Divine Nature is also called the Father, so that when the word Father is used, it means the Father Divine 
Nature. Thus if we were to say God the Father, it means the Father Divine Nature (Galatians 1:3). But there is also the person of the father in which the Divine Nature officially dwells. 
The Bible used the word Father to sometimes mean just the Di-vine Nature without any reference to the person of the Father, and 
then it uses the word Father to mean the Father Person (in whom the Divine Nature dwells). So in this tract we shall layout verses 
from the Bible where the word “Father” means not the person of the Father, but the Divine Nature, we will call this the Father Di-
vine Nature to so indicate; and we shall isolate verses where the word “Father” means the Divine Nature in the person of the Fa-
ther specifically, and indicate them under the heading Father Person. This is the pattern we shall follow. This tract is written to en-
courage focus on the word Father in the Bible, and to encourage close scrutiny and judgment on the matter, by each individual as he studies the verses from his Bible. It is meant to heighten the consciousness about spiritual things and to develop discernment 
in the Scriptures. May all who study be blessed in like manner. 
Amen.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WHAT OUR INQUIRY ABOUT OURSELVES SHOULD BE?

WHAT OUR INQUIRY ABOUT OURSELVES  SHOULD BE? We are in the very last days, we are told that the last controversy will be very short. “We are standing on the threshold of great and solemn events. Prophecies are fulfilling. The last great conflict will be short, but terrible. Old controversies will be revived. New controversies will arise. We have a great work to do. Our ministerial work must not cease. The last warning must be given to the world. There is a special power in the presentation of the truth at the present time. How long will it last? Only a little while.” Ellen G. White, Selected Messages bk. 3, pg. 419. And in view of the lateness of time, what should be the inquiry of everyone? We are told: “The inquiry of everyone should be ‘whose am I? To whom do I owe allegiance? Is my heart renewed? Is my soul reformed? Are my sins forgiven? Will they be blotted out when the time of refreshing shall come?” Ibid, pg. 419. We must needs examine ourselves to see if we are

DID ELLEN G. WHITE EVER CALL THE S.D.A. CHURCH BABYLON IN ANY WAY? BY NYRON MEDINA

In the Bible is brought to view the following statement: “And after these things I  saw another angel come down from heaven, having great power; and the earth was  lightened with his glory. And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying,  Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird. For all  nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the  earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are  waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies. And I heard another voice  from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her  sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.” Revelation 18:1-4. Of this Scripture  we are told that it speaks about the Church, fallen because of sins. “In amazement  they [the people] hear the testimony that Babylon is the church,

IMPUTED AND IMPARTED RIGHTEOUSNESS EXPLAINED By Nyron Medina

IMPUTED AND IMPARTED RIGHTEOUSNESS  EXPLAINED By Nyron Medina Statement of the case 1. Imputed and imparted righteousness are usually seen as different things in apostate  theology; they are presented as happening either successively or at the very same time,  but they are presented as two different salvific functions.  “In this most illuminating paragraph, the writer traces two distinct phases in the process  of our salvation—two complementary aspects of the plan of redemption—which are in a  certain sense successive, but at the same time simultaneous; two different operations of  the same righteousness of Christ, which alone can satisfy the demands of divine justice  and make saints of us. Let us analyze in outline form these two phases:  A. THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF CHRIST BY WHICH WE ARE JUSTIFIED.  1. It is imputed to us, which is, credited, granted freely without our earning it.  2. It provides our right to heaven. It is the only merit we can claim.