Skip to main content

Rev 17: 6 Exposited:

a) The fact that the woman of false religion is drunken with the blood of saints and martyrs of Jesus means that she is a persecuting power of genocidal proportions. She has murdered and is responsible for the murder of millions of God’s people. Rev 13: 7; Rev 16: 4-6.
b) The term “drunken with the blood of the saints”, explains a type of actual drunkenness that comes upon mass murderers. Men of this type of drunkenness are like Lenin, Starlin, Trotsky, Mao Tse Dong, and Pol Pot in modern times; then there was Julius Caesar, Muhammed, Nero, Caligula, Atilla, and many others in ancient times. The term we use for this is Genocidal Intoxication. It means “loss of mental balance and cohesion through a convoluted conscience that has resisted conviction because of genocide”. It is a madness of genocidal murder. It also means that once the opportunity is made available, this false religion will do genocide again. We know this because:
i) We are told that there is to be an ancient genocidal persecution upon God’s church that eventually breaks or ceases for a while. Matt 24: 21, 22.
ii) We are also told that after a break of the persecutive genocide, this period of temporary peace (the era of Republicanism), a new rounds of genocidal persecution is to happen. Rev 6: 9-11.
iii) The new rounds of persecutive genocide resumes when American Republicanism falls to Commuligion. Rev 13: 11, 15. Rev 20: 4.
c) The concept that those who murder God’s people at a later date is responsible for the murder of God’s people at an earlier date also, because they hold the self-same spirit, experience and principles of the earlier murderers of God’s people going back to Cain, is a doctrine taught by Jesus. Matt 23: 31-36.
d) This same teaching and principle applies to the apostate false religion of the Papal church. Rev 18: 24.
e) The vision that John saw of this genocidal and idolatrous false church amazed him; this will be because all her deeds were done in the name of Jesus. ( Rev 17: 6, Jn 16: 1-3

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WHAT OUR INQUIRY ABOUT OURSELVES SHOULD BE?

WHAT OUR INQUIRY ABOUT OURSELVES  SHOULD BE? We are in the very last days, we are told that the last controversy will be very short. “We are standing on the threshold of great and solemn events. Prophecies are fulfilling. The last great conflict will be short, but terrible. Old controversies will be revived. New controversies will arise. We have a great work to do. Our ministerial work must not cease. The last warning must be given to the world. There is a special power in the presentation of the truth at the present time. How long will it last? Only a little while.” Ellen G. White, Selected Messages bk. 3, pg. 419. And in view of the lateness of time, what should be the inquiry of everyone? We are told: “The inquiry of everyone should be ‘whose am I? To whom do I owe allegiance? Is my heart renewed? Is my soul reformed? Are my sins forgiven? Will they be blotted out when the time of refreshing shall come?” Ibid, pg. 419. We must needs examine ourselves to see if we...

IMPUTED AND IMPARTED RIGHTEOUSNESS EXPLAINED By Nyron Medina

IMPUTED AND IMPARTED RIGHTEOUSNESS  EXPLAINED By Nyron Medina Statement of the case 1. Imputed and imparted righteousness are usually seen as different things in apostate  theology; they are presented as happening either successively or at the very same time,  but they are presented as two different salvific functions.  “In this most illuminating paragraph, the writer traces two distinct phases in the process  of our salvation—two complementary aspects of the plan of redemption—which are in a  certain sense successive, but at the same time simultaneous; two different operations of  the same righteousness of Christ, which alone can satisfy the demands of divine justice  and make saints of us. Let us analyze in outline form these two phases:  A. THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF CHRIST BY WHICH WE ARE JUSTIFIED.  1. It is imputed to us, which is, credited, granted freely without our earning it.  2. It provides our r...

EGW QUOTE ON SINFUL NATURE

We are told that Jesus had our “sinful nature.” “He took upon Him our sinful nature.” Ellen G. White, Signs of the Times, 7/30/02. “In him was no guile nor sinfulness,….yet He took upon Him our sinful nature.” Ibid. From what we have just read, we see that the term “sinful nature” for Mrs. White does not mean that the person has sin for she says that Jesus was sinfree. But what does sinful nature mean that the person? A. It means human nature affected by sin not infected with  sin. B. It means human nature weakened by sin, but not resided by sin. C. This is the Mind, Emotions/Passions, Flesh and Experience weakened by sin, but not necessarily indwelt by sin. D. It is quite true that man’s sinful nature, a nature weakened by sin, in the average sinner may have sin in it. So sinful nature for the sinner in sin is a nature weakened by sin, but the man has sin in this nature. E. This means the man has sin in his Mind, Passions/Emotions, Experience, and sin in his flesh is sin in his Mi...